Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: A Case Report

Main Article Content

Paulina Flores-Naranjo

Abstract

The gestational trophoblastic disease is caused by the highly abnormal development of placental trophoblastic tissue, consisting of benign and malignant disorders. The hydatidiform mole has the highest incidence. In its development, several factors intervene, among which age, previous molar pregnancy, and habits influence a significant percentage. The hydatidiform mole constitutes excessive trophoblastic proliferation in addition to abnormal embryonic development, being complete or partial and differentiated genetically by its diploid and triploid karyotype, respectively. The present study aimed to present the presentation of gestational trophoblastic disease and the importance of its detection, treatment, and follow-up to prevent possible complications. The diagnosis is based on a multifactorial approach that constitutes clinical features, quantitative determination of beta human chorionic gonadotropin, and abdominal or transvaginal ultrasound. It is confirmed through anatomopathological and immunohistochemical study, cytogenetic techniques, and DNA analysis, which has allowed the identification and differentiation of complete and partial molar pregnancy. Treatment is based on spiral curettage after mechanical cervical dilatation and under ultrasound guidance; in patients with good parity, hysterectomy is the best option. Surveillance and follow-up are crucial to avoid gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after a molar pregnancy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Flores-Naranjo, P. (2022). Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: A Case Report. Publicare, 2(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.56931/pb.2022.21_10
Section
Artículos

References

J. Brown, R. W. Naumann, M. J. Seckl, y J. Schink, “15years of progress in gestational trophoblastic disease: Scoring, standardization, and salvage”, Gynecol. Oncol., vol. 144, núm. 1, pp. 200–207, ene. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.330.

H. Y. S. Ngan etal., “Update on the diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease”, Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., vol. 143, pp. 79–85, oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12615.

S. Bruce y J. Sorosky, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. StatPearls Publishing, 2017.

Y. K. Eysbouts etal., “Dutch Risk Classification and FIGO 2000 for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Compared”, Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, vol. 26, núm. 9, pp. 1712–1716, nov. 2016, doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000812.

A. M. Shaaban etal., “Gestational trophoblastic disease: Clinical and imaging features”, Radiographics, vol. 37, núm. 2, pp. 681–700, 2017, doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160140.

I. Kalogiannidis, K. Kalinderi, M. Kalinderis, D. Miliaras, B. Tarlatzis, y A. Athanasiadis, “Recurrent complete hydatidiform mole: where we are, is there a safe gestational horizon? Opinion and mini-review”, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., vol. 35, núm. 6, pp.967–973, may 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1202-9.

L. C. Bermúdez, Y. A. Llanes, M. G. Herrera, M. P. C. Cabrera, A. F. Casanova, y G. P. Rivera, “Mola hidatiforme parcial del segundo trimestre”, Rev. Cuba. Obstet. y Ginecol., vol. 44, núm. 2, pp. 1–12, oct. 2018.

Y. Çekmez, E. T. Haberal, İ. Ulu, y S. Gülşen, “Re: Hormonal contraceptive use before hCG remission does not increase the risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia following a complete hydatidiform mole: a historical database review”, BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., vol. 123, núm. 10, p. 1706, sep. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14078.

Y. Zhao, G. W. Xiong, X. W. Zhang, y B. Hang, “Is Ki-67 of diagnostic value in distinguishing between

P. Flores-Naranjo45partial and complete hydatidiform moles? A systematic review and meta-analysis”, Anticancer Res., vol. 38, núm. 2, pp. 1105–1110, 2018, doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12329.

R. V. Martínez Camilo, “Mola invasiva”, Rev. Cuba. Obstet. y Ginecol., vol. 42, núm. 3, pp. 366–371, sep. 2016.

N. Al Riyami, M. Al Riyami, A. T. Al Hajri, S. Al Saidi, B. Salman, y M. Al Kalbani, “Gestationaltrophoblastic disease at sultan qaboos university hospital: Prevalence, risk factors, histological features, sonographic findings, and outcomes”, Oman Med. J., vol. 34, núm. 3, pp. 200–204, may 2019, doi: 10.5001/omj.2019.39.

F. Ning, H. Hou, A. N. Morse, y G. E. Lash, “Understanding and management of gestational trophoblastic disease”, F1000Research, vol. 8, 2019, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14953.1.

A. Braga etal., “Does a human chorionic gonadotropin level of over 20,000 IU/L four weeks after uterine evacuation for complete hydatidiform mole constitute an indication for chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?”, Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., vol. 223, pp. 50–55, abr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.001.